Judge explains why Hurricane Energy plan failed “no worse off” test
Credit: shutterstock/ m.afiqsyahmi
An English judge has explained why Hurricane Energy’s restructuring plan failed the “no worse off” test for its shareholders in his published reasons for refusing sanction – and said even if it hadn’t failed the test, the plan would still have been rejected because the company is profitable.
To read more
Subscribe to Global Restructuring Review
Register for limited access
Register to receive our newsletter and gain limited access to subscriber content.
Register now
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the Global Restructuring Review experts.
Subscribe now